Japanese Relocation Research

The Hawaiian island and West Coast of United States were not safe. The Japanese were exploiting the West Coast vulnerability (Murphey, 1995). Obvious possibilities included sabotage, aid to an invading army and espionage. There was proof of Japan purpose to utilize the circumstance. The office of Naval intelligence described a Japanese ‘intelligence machine ready for war, in action and using the west coast Japanese. The common way of law in a judicial system respect personal rights by availing each a due process. The policy treated the Japanese-Americans as a single group thus providing critics with the base of denunciation of American policy. Dwight Murphy also talks about the Asian-American stereotypes. His defense of relocation played a huge role upon some of the existing stereotypes about Asian Americans After the Pearl Harbor attack, around three thousand Japanese were arrested for being classified as dangerous.

The west coast was declared a military zone and all persons of Japanese origin were relocated. However, Myer said that care provides by professionals was excellent and not charged (Murphey, 1995). There were claims of economic and property losses during the relocation but Col. Bendetsen testifies that after the army was in charge of the relocation, efforts were made to ensure the safety of the evacuees’ belonging. Additionally, in 1948 the evacuees were compensated for property loss. Some critics may ask why the Japanese-Americans were relocated and not German or Italian.  The Dispossession of the American Indian: And Other Key Issues in American History. Scott-Townsend ASSIGNMENT 2 My immigrant chronicle outline 1. Introduction The first Asian ancestry to arrive in America happened in the early 1830’s.