Still life art essay
Still-life has also been interpreted as one of the sensitive register of numerous aesthetic, ethical, and mercantile values that characterize the 17th Century Dutch culture (Brusati, 144). A good example is the Evisceration of a Roebuck with a Portrait of a Married Couple by Frans Snyders, which create a sheer visual delight through its pleasurable illusions. A casual look at this piece of art reveals how assiduous the maker was in bringing out the pictorial illusions. The still-life genre celebrates craft as a creation of both value and knowledge and is obsessively aware of the expressions of entrenched anxieties about the Dutch society, whose affluence is unprecedented. Frans Snyders’ Evisceration of a Roebuck with a Portrait of a Married Couple is a perfect example of a still-life painting as it derives realism from the carefully grouped objects and the play of light.
The fruits along with the game animals appear to be filling the picture space and seem to be extending beyond the limits. Through this technique, Snyder manages to enhance the sense of immediacy of the viewer. The painting derives its realism from the carefully grouped objects, the play of light, and from the painting techniques that are refined and utilized in conveying the represented material’s texture (Brusati, 144). The artist has made a good choice of support, which is a cradled wood panel, through which he has made efforts of simulating the objects' character and this brings in the realist perspective of still-life. The viewpoint articulates that the objectives along with the achievement of this specialty in regards to manipulation of materials by the artist in an accurate simulation in much of the subject's literature.
From $10 to earn access
Only on Studyloop