Why Medical Practitioners Fail to Uphold Office Standards

Medical practitioners are required to take an oath that will make them stick to the laws of the practice. However, this is not the case as some of the medical practitioners are at times unable to uphold the standards required of them at work. The paper will look into the ethical issue and office standards in general and to the reasons as to why medical practitioners fail to uphold the office standards. In medicine, some guidelines are deeply rooted in the Hippocratic Oath. The guidelines act as the foundation to these codes of ethics. Medical practitioners have three primary duties. Among many other duties, the practitioners have the burden of autonomy, confidentiality and the role to take care of all patients.

The three tasks are complemented by the golden rules of beneficence, independence, and nonmaleficence. Beneficence is the duty that involves the promoting or conducting oneself in the best interest of the patient is taken care of. The same commitment of beneficence requires that the medical practitioners avoid causing harm to the patient at all costs (Martinez-Romero, 2013).  For this to be considered, the injured patient must have incurred physical, monetary, or emotional disturbances. Creating proper moral standards is vital in healthcare institutions. Healthcare places and facilities must abide by the local and government rules in their handling of patients and facility operations. Healthcare managers are the ones usually delegated with the responsibility for developing and maintaining these codes. Doing this requires significant thought and deliberation.

Good health practices characterize what is expected of all medics. They must be aware of these ethical medical conducts and the explanation guidelines that support them. The healthcare providers should use their judgment while implementing the doctrines to the different situations they face in their work. Health practitioners should be able to account for the decisions and actions they take while on duty. Health practitioners have a responsibility always to behave and present themselves in a well-skilled manner, and show respect for all individuals, whether its fellow workmates, patients or members of the public. Case laws are a vital source of orders in determining different issues of negligence originating out of healthcare. The medical career is always seen as an imperial job because it plays a part in safeguarding life.

Everyone believes that life is given by a supreme being. Thus, health practitioners work in the plan of to this supreme being as they attempt to take charge of His will. An ill person seeks a healthcare provider found on his or her identity. Besides, accounting for a medical failure is not an easy task, and hence most of them are not reported. In most instances, it is difficult to detect an individual’s medical mistake, but it is important to experience the instances and try to be taught from it so to avoid impending mishaps or even prevent them. Establishing the risk aspects for clinical mistakes is the most vital initial step in the direction of its avoidance and is the essential target of quality care guarantee.

Self-anticipated clinical mistakes are everyday happenings among nurses and are relating with subsequential individual anxiety. As a result of the corrective mistake, medics at all training stages face feelings of guilt, anger, sense of despair and knowledge of the lack enough of alternating degree. The health practitioners have various reasons for not wanting to report their failure in living up to the official standards. Some of the reasons may be regarded to ethical implications that most of them are afraid of (Zlotnik Shaul, 2012). Some nurses are so razed and ashamed of their errors that they might try to hide them or employ defensive options by blaming the blame on another medic or something else.  Ethical limits work when clinical care errors are made.

 Respect for patient autonomy is sovereign, as is the significance of openness. Healthcare givers have legit and proper obligations to report dangers, benefits, and alternative care measures through well-consulted consent authorization. Legit self-interest and accountability after mistakes are made must be toned down by the regulation of devotion.  This moral doctrine has been fortified by real lessons learned from mistakes. It usually occurs primarily when a disastrous event causes severe injury or even casualty. There are proper and upright responsibilities to reveal information. Also, reports can echo the medic’s capability to identify an error and readiness to report the mistake, whether through formal reporting techniques or authorization in patient records. A rational finding in the research is that medics and physicians can detect error happenings.

References Bærøe, K. Ives, J. de Vries, M. org/10. Martinez-Romero, M. Ethical and legal issues in the clinical practice of primary health care.  Frontiers In Bioscience, E5(2), 435-445. doi.