Administrative Procedure Act research

Document Type:Research Paper

Subject Area:Law

Document 1

The decisions must be within the confines of the law, set procedural requirements, uphold constitutional rights, and be based on approved evidence (St Antoine, 2014). The APA is in control of internal decision-making processes of administrative agencies towards their interactions with the public. The APA states that an agency should incorporate office of the president and Congress should come in on behalf of the president to ensure requirements set by APA towards agencies are met. This paper focuses on the Administrative Act Procedure which is aimed at improving justice administration through the prescription of fair administrative procedures and the provision of a comprehensive charter of the official fairness and private liberty. The paper will focus on how the Administrative Procedure Act influences the actions of agencies and the extent of the effect through rule making, adjudication, policy declarations, and final judicial review.

Sign up to view the full document!

All the comments from the public are considered when passing a law. A formal rulemaking is when the agency requires a court-room style hearing. This may occur due to some certain cases whereby the decisions are made based on the strength of the evidence delivered or acknowledged on the record. This method of rulemaking is only applicable for two circumstances, "when the statute provides rules required to be made on the record after an opportunity for an agency hearing" and "when the rulemaking involves adjudicative facts or the facts that are specific to the individual's rights". These statues are seen to require more than a mere informal notice and comment rulemaking. Adjudication comes in two forms just like in the rulemaking, formal and informal.

Sign up to view the full document!

In the formal adjudication, although certainly, a limited exception applies, the statue is essential to be held "on the record after opportunity of an agency hearing". When it comes to informal adjudications, it is the responsibility of each agency to determine their own procedure since the APA does not take part in setting out rules. Just like in the formal rulemaking, formal adjudication requires the introduced evidence on the record (St Antoine, 2014). Subject to formal adjudications, notices including time, place and the nature of the hearing, matters concerning fact and law and the legal authority and jurisdiction are given to an individual. APA provides rulemaking processes which agencies must adhere to. They should issue a notice of its proposed rulemaking process which has been provided at the Federal Publication.

Sign up to view the full document!

Information on prior notices contains proposed dates when the rule will become operational, legal authority which the law will be operating under, and the framework stipulating the rule. Federal Register is an official platform for publication of rules, new rules proposal, and other official information publications. Agencies then await public recommendations on the proposed law. The court review checks on the constitutional rights, powers, and privileges. The reviewing also include checking the excess statutory jurisdiction authority and their limitations, observing the procedure required by the law, giving reviews on the records of agency hearing given by the statue and also extending the facts subject to trials. According to US Legal, agency rules also can fall under one of four categories: "legislative rules; interpretive rules, procedural rules; and a general statement of policy.

Sign up to view the full document!

" A legislative rule has the "force of law and imposes new duties on affected parties" (US Legal, Inc, n. d. Agencies have the liberty to make their own decision-making procedures regarding the minimum requirements of law or natural justice fairness (Gilbert & Cohen, 2017). On the contra, formal administrative processes involve almost a full-blown trial-like hearing in regard to the magnitude of the individual interest at hand. Besides, parent act or other statues can dictate an agency to conduct a formal hearing before getting a decision (YOHANNES, A. , & G/MICHAEL, 2012). In administrative due process procedure, the court involved should look into two determinants; whether Due Process Clause is applicable and what process is in order to ensure esteemed fairness. As indicated, although agencies have lawmaking powers, they have "limited powers delegated by Congress.

Sign up to view the full document!

" Most agencies fall under the direction of the President. For example, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the FBI. The states also have administrative agencies to take care of some specific issues such as labor laws, education, and public health. However, there are also independent agencies like the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) where the President has “limited powers in removing the head of these independent agencies ” so-to-speak, even though, the President is involved in the appointment of filling vacancies, so “he plays a role in influencing the activities of the agencies” (US Legal, Inc, n. The act was the starting point for commission consideration. Effects of judicial review of agency decisions on agency actions and limitations of agency Power Agency decisions are limited by judicial processes.

Sign up to view the full document!

Concluded decisions arrived at by an agency are mandated to undergo judicial review. A court must determine whether an agency decision is compliant to all relevant sections of the constitution and Statute and how practicable the provisions are (Center, 2010). The court conducts three standard reviews on agency decisions; substantial evidence, arbitrary and capricious; and statutory interpretations. In the same vein, agencies are duty-bound to conduct public participation whenever they make any rules. As the paper has posited, informal hearings usually entail input from the agencies, meaning that agencies are at liberty to make their own decision-making procedures. Formal hearings, on the other hand, are conducted within the purview of the Due Process Clause. Accordingly, in the formal hearings, a respondent is entitled to a fair hearing, which includes the right to challenge the evidence against them and to cross-examine the witnesses of the agency.

Sign up to view the full document!

From $10 to earn access

Only on Studyloop

Original template

Downloadable