Role of hospice in the transition from hospital to home for technology dependent children critique

In statistic, the article is justly mystifying for beginning paragraphs. The author begins by addressing controversies that exist between parents and professionals in the field of medicine, however a conflict emerges when an individual in his or her own capacity is not able to appreciate the dynamism and changes in technology as well as how both parties feel when given the responsibility of managing and nurturing the required palliative patients and infants at home. Both professions and focused grouped that the researcher considered in doing the research have different views concerning the topic of study. And in trying to achieve the objectives as to whether transition is necessary, many issues arose in the study and the researched had to go into a further study to find justification of whether parents have skills and knowledge that will help them manage those in palliative care when discharged from hospital to homes.

Another influence outside the external factors that affects is how the society at large perceive hospice technology, taking the fact that it is worldly recognized, fear is also imparted on parents and the issue concerning these fear should need the researcher to have a strong assurance as to whether parents and both focused group professionals will accept the initiative and in doing the pilot testing need to consider a larger population portraying similar characteristics in term of both economic, social and political believes, so as in giving the assurance the have to affirm that so as to avoid controversies. Work cited Akard, T. F. , Gilmer, M. J. , Miller, M. , Chaves, A. , Syed, F. , & Moraes, T. Technology-dependent children: The chronically ventilated child.

Current Pediatric Reviews, 8(2), 114–130(17). , & Casey, M. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Margolan, H. , Fraser, J. pdf Murphy, G. The technology-dependent child at home Part 1: In whose best interest? Paediatric Nursing, 13(7), 14–18. Murphy, N. , Christian, B. , Caplin, D. F. , & Beck, C. T. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. R. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. Silverman, D. Doing Qualitative Research. , & Hertzog, J. H. Hospital Discharge of Respiratory-Technology-Dependent Children: Role of a Dedicated Respiratory Care Discharge Coordinator. Respiratory Care, 51(7), 744– 749. Together for Short Lives (2016). , & Fox, H. Technology-dependent children: Hospital versus home care. Congress of the United States: Office of Technology Assessment. Wallis, C. , Paton, J. Whiting, M. Children with disability and complex health needs: The impact on family life.

Nursing Children and Young People, 26(3), 26–30. Woodgate, R. , Edwards, M. Bahn, S. , & Weatherill, P. Qualitative social research: A risky business when it comes to collecting ‘sensitive’ data. Qualitative Research, 13(3), 19–35. Boyatzis, R. C. , Howlin, F. , & Connolly, M. Parents’ perspectives of the transition to home when a child has complex technological health care needs. International Journal of Integrated Care, DOI: http://doi. , Bray, C. , Sanders, C. , Miert, C. , Hunt, A. , & Moore, A. National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services: Children and young people who are ill: Standard 6–15. London: Department of Health. Dyregov, K. Bereaved parents experiences of research participation. Social Science and Medicine, 58(2), 391–400. British Dental Journal, 204, 291–295. Goodman, C. , & Evans, C. Focus groups. In: K. Belfast: HSC Board. Heaton, J. , Noyes, J.