The Case of Jose Case Assignment

Using Jose’s case, as an illustration, the assignment below will present an assessment of the overall background and culture of Jose and how the two aspects define the life and counselling needs of the client. The paper will as well focus on the various diversity issues noted in the case in the line of gender, culture, ageism, and race, the mode of therapy that would be most efficient in counselling Jose, and the ethical and legal implications of Jose’s case. Assessment of the Case The prevalent theme in Jose’s case in isolation. Jose’s personal isolation significantly limits Jose’s social life or the connection that the client has not only with the members of his family but also with other members of the community including people at his work and school environment.

Isolation is the major aspect that affects the mental and physical well-being of the client. Diversity Issues in the Case One of the diversity issues present in Jose’s case is a culture that has values or traits that require the development and management of quality interpersonal relationships with family members and friends. Latino culture stresses the importance of family cooperation and fulfilling family roles as required of every member of the society (Sue & Sue, 2015). Though Jose has been able to serve the major role of taking care of his mother as expected of him, the level to which he is connected to his family remains low. This issue that directly affects his well-being. Taking an example, there is no connection between Jose and his father a fact that affects how the client communicates with his parents.

Being 35 years old, it is expected that Jose should have settled down with a wife and children according to the view of his family members. As a result, the family pushes him to settle down so that he can meet his role of raising and taking care of a family. The basis of this prejudice is the age of Jose since, in a real sense, the age at which one chooses to begin a family or the decision to have a family is personal. Ageism in the Latino culture does not only affect how people are treated but how people are viewed in the society based in the achievements that one is expected to accomplish at a given age (Nelson, 2008). Mode of Therapy Considering that Jose’s problem is wide and involves several causes or contributing factors, it is vital to hold individual therapy, family therapy, and group therapy with the aim of helping Jose, his family, and the way in which he is able to interact with other members of society.

Interacting with people that are at different recovery levels but with the same problem creates hope to those beginning therapy as they are able to see that they can change by facing a given problem. Sharing information within the therapy groups is the basic principle of group therapy and is of great value. Group therapy enhances the sharing of strengths with the aim of helping others boost their confidence and self-esteem. Group therapy creates a family in which people can positively view events that led to certain behaviours and personalities, and how they can change the behaviours to improve the quality of life (Tseng & Hsu, 2018). Legal and Ethical Implications of the Case One of the ethical implications of the case is autonomy.

Race, gender, culture, and age being the contributing factors in the challenge that Jose is facing, the counsellor should ensure delivery of culturally competent culture to ensure the client benefits maximally from the counselling. Conclusion From the discussion above, it is apparent that one of the major themes on Jose’s case is isolation that leads him to a state of depression and low self-esteem. Among the major inquiries that a counsellor should make before sitting to resolve the client’s problem are the underlying causes of his behaviour and actions with the aim of improving his ability to make positive decisions. Ageism, culture and gender are the major diversity issues present in the case. Jose’s counselling needs are integral.