What Effect Does Exposed Tattoos have on the work environment

’’ (Tuan, 1980: 472). Considering such an idea one may imagine that individuals may be seen by others through the focal points of belonging. Additionally, that such saying might be a standout amongst the most straightforward yet great realities with respect to product consumer conduct (Van Esterick, 1986; Feirstein, 1986; Rosenbaum, 1972). All through various areas and different categories of individuals can express their sexual orientation, values, societal position and in addition their social parts, their way of life and interests and different highlights which may have an impact with respect to their character. Something through which individuals can convey what needs be might be more innovative than another yet all articulations are done in a method for certain form. This chapter of the study will show ideas applicable to understanding the subjects and the aftereffects of the study, the structure identified with the trashing idea of tattoos and their part in the word related world.

Purpose of the Study The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects that the tattooed body has on the work environment by looking at some of the findings that the previous studies have reported regarding the topic. To begin with, Miller, Nicols and Eure (2009) conducted a study in which they demonstrated that stigmatization towards employees who have visible tattoos acts as a real factor towards the work environment. Their example identifies the body craftsmanship wearers as being less acknowledged and not gaining favor as associates, and they were assessed all the more inadequately by bosses, regardless of the present increased popularity and general acknowledgment of body workmanship. The recommendations offered by Miller, Nicols and Eure (2009) is that individuals may have diverse views on the tattoos on themselves than on other individuals, so they are assessed all the more adversely on others, particularly with regard to circumstances where a work accomplice's appearance can be required to assume a part in the achievement or reward identified with the job needing to be done.

They may not want to bring into their work environment individuals whose behavior is in question as a result of the physical indicator visible from their skins because of the engraved tattoos. In a different study that examined the tattoos when linked to the behavior, Haywood et al. (2012) found that tattooing is related to the risk-taking behaviors such as cannabis use (that affect women alone), smoking, having unending cases of depression (affecting men alone) and having greater numbers of lifetime sexual partners. Employers who are aware of these facts may be reluctant to retain tattooed individuals. Further, those who might be unlucky to recruit these persons might experience significant change because of the new behaviors that might manifest at the workplace from the tattooed individuals obeying the theories.

The topic was selected to assist in enlightening people of the situation that arises in work place when people with tattooed body are part of the organization culture. This study, however, will be limited in the psychology profession and other lines of profession will only be generalized or discussed shallowly. Significance of the Study The topic on the effect that exposed tattoos have on the work environment is an important topic for study to the writer, the major stakeholders and the larger industry. It is traditionally known that employees are selected in the organizations by utilization of the job interview criteria. However, researchers are exposing that the job interviews are not always the may be inaccurate techniques of predicting the actual job performance (Hunter & Hunter, 1984).

For the psychologists, in particular, this topic will have a lot of significance given that the topic regarding them is sparsely studied to the present date. In the past, the effect that the body modifications of the psychologists have not been identified in the psychological treatment settings. Although the has been little research on the topic, there has no be clear framework established on the topic. all the tattooed professionals may have particular interest with the psychologists with body tattoos especially that their profession is about interaction and the appearance of the psychologists will a great impact on the kind of relationship that will be exhibited between the psychologist and their client. Essentially, this topic will benefit these professionals by making them understand that people have a tainted perception regarding tattoos and there is the tendency to have a social stigma for the people with exposed body tattoos.

For these reasons, this topic is also important for the larger industry. Organization Overview One cannot deny the fact that tattooing has ingrained in the work environment because of its continued increase in penetration in the workplace culture. The reach of tattooing was outlined in a study conducted by Kosut (2006). The researcher found that there are people in particular professions whom when they adapt particular characters, then they act as marketers of the behavior to the larger population, facilitating its faster spread. The media personalities, for example, are iconic people and who are seen by a very large population. However, other people in the industry still scrutinize the modifications to the body that are done with the intention of enhancing self-esteem of improving the outer images.

The larger portion tend to have a negative judgement which acts as a reflection of prejudice against other people who possess modifications. When the tattoos are negatively evaluated, unfair treatments can also result when it comes to the social interactions and such opportunities like the vocational outlook. Tattooed individuals have limited chances of securing employment in the industry because they have worries regarding the reactions of the clients or because of possessing the discriminatory attitude. An inner conflict can be created for the tattoo-modified individuals as a result of concealing their pieces for not expressing their self-identity fully (Ellis, 2015; Kernis & Goldman, 2005). Statistics show a variation by the utilized metrics and the examined group. However, the research has indicated that about 10 percent of the population do modifications on their body (Kosut, 2006; Martí, 2010).

The adolescents and the young adults are the groups pf people who have been identified to be embrace body modifications to the largest extent in the American culture. The extent wit which a particular population or demography is affected by the tattooing is variable because of the factors surrounding the culture of the samples selected for the study among other variable factors that influence people into such conduct. However, they all get the same treatment when seeking to work in particular professions or work environment whose perception of the body tattoos is negative. However, many still agreed that one’s job position will be affected by having a body tattoo, indicating that the body tattoos can have serious implications on the future career of a person.

What is the relationship between the body tattoos and stigmatization? People with open body tattoos are usually stigmatized at the work place by the co-workers, clients and supervisors who have a negative perception regarding the body tattoos. Past studies have shown that tattooed people are usually associated with particular bad behaviors that include drug use, defiance character and addiction to sex among others. Besides, there are cases in which supervisors will just see them as lazy, hence will be kept at pressure at workplace and strict supervision that they may end up being overworked as opposed to other non-tattooed employees. Do tattoos represent a good or bad image to the customers? There are some positions that persons with open body tattoos cannot undertake in the organization given that they involve in interaction with the customers and clients and holding such a position would send a bad image of the organization to the market.

The interviews were conducted with the participants twice over the phone with the initial interview being conducted on May, 2018 and the second interview conducted on July, 2018. The interviewees were semi-structed and lasted for an hour with each of the participants. The interviewees were required to give descriptions of their tattoos or the experiences of staying around the people with open body tattoos in their profession, the reaction of the clients towards the tattoos and their thoughts about tattooed professions who represent the brand image or who are involved in interaction with the clients. The interviews were transcribed were transcribed verbatim, excluding the filler words from the interview. This would guide the analysis that was to be carried out through the finding of similar themes from the results which facilitated in the definition of the critical themes were common in the study.

From that time, the researchers have been noting a relationship between the individuals with body tattoos and their association with the defiant groups (e. g. gang Members, prisoners; Atkinson, 2003). Recently, such literature was used by Burgess and Clark (2010) to form their basis of examining whether the tattoo content has a difference in the manner in which the tattooed individuals are perceived in the workplace and the industry at large. Their research found that individuals who had traditional tattoos has less rating, regarding their suitability for employment as opposed to the individual who were only displaying contemporary tattoos on their body skin. , 2009, p. The greater the number of the visible tattoos that a person has, then the greater is the ratings of how they are perceived in a negative manner and associated with the defiance behaviors.

When the tattoos are linked to behavior, then individuals who have them on their body can be linked to lack of discipline, self-control, and inability to consider the future (DeMello, 2000). Haywood et al. (2012) also conducted a study to investigate the relationship between tattooing and risk-taking behavior such as greater number of lifetime sexual partners, smoking, use of cannabis that was great among women and ever having cases of depression that was seen to affect men only (p. However, all the tattooed professionals have particular interest with the tattooed professional psychologist because of the nature of their work. Majority are interested in seeing how the body tattoos would affect the relationship that psychologists with tattooed body has on the patients and the clients.

The relationship between the two parties would be defined greatly from the identification of the psychologist and their general image. People with negative perception regarding body tattoos will have a negative attitude towards the psychologist and a poor relationship during the treatment session. Further, this form of modification can affect the relationship with co-workers, which might lead to stigmatization in cases the colleagues link the body tattoos to negative behaviors. However, Frederick and Bradley (2000) did not find any support in their study that could support the connection between the body modification and the greater prevalence of the negative psychological issues. Tattoos can be public representations of deeply private emotions when exposed to their visibility. Tattoos and rebellion One can also call the continued role of tattoos for rebellion or shock into question with increased marketing of tattoos as “cool” (Kosut, 2006).

There is some uniqueness in the manner that tattoos use an element of fashion because if their semi-permanence state, but are contradictory long-term fad (Kosut, 2006). Discarding of tattoos is not easy as non-stylish or as out-of-date like it happens with the trending fashion clothes among other items. 432) indicates that the need for expressing individuality, a sign of communicating rebellion, definition of a group membership, marking milestones such as death por life and conveyance of spiritual meaning are among the reasons. It has also been found that tattooing is used in some cases to represent a bodily way in which individual express uniqueness. Interestingly, it was found that out that the number of tattoos a person has have a positive correlation with their strength of identification with music.

In psychology, tattooing has been largely examined from the cultural point of view. The researchers have been noting a relationship between the individuals with body tattoos and their association with the defiant groups (e. There are yet, those who still associate the tattooed individuals as people who are criminals or people who are psychologically disturbed. However, not many people have these attitudes as majority of the people who perceive tattooing negatively associates them to different behaviors. Altogether, the study has found that tattooed employees are not treated the same like their untattooed counterparts. The study has indicated that not all prejudices can fade out because the negative stereotyping is still widespread for the tattooed individuals in the workplace. Non-tattooed employees do not like their tattooed co-workers as they perceive them to be less attractive and less intelligent.

There are people who cannot get promotion or hold at particular job positions because of the body tattoos. For the professional psychologists, interesting findings were made from the study. Most of the other people in different professionals are usually keen on psychologists who have body tattoos because they know such people hold delicate jobs that involves interaction with the clients and the patients. The appearance of psychologist defines the nature of relationship that will be developed between the patient and the psychologist throughout the treatment session. However, tattooing their bodies can affect the level and quality of service delivery significantly especially when they have to deal with individuals who have a strong negative perception towards the body tattoos. People would judge the organization principles, policies and culture from the perceived image from its employees.

As a result, having a tattooed employee in the organization could send a bad image about the organization. Therefore, the employers tend to evaluate these employees more poorly as opposed to their counterparts who do not have the body tattoos despite the general acceptance and the current popularity of the body art. Similarly, the career of professional psychologists is associated with the image and the general perception the clients because the interaction with the clients and the patients will be determined by the general image of the psychologist. Based on how they see the psychologist, some of the patients and clients may be uncomfortable with psychologists who have open body tattoos if they have a negative perception of such form of body identification and if they associate body tattoos with particular vices in the society.

Based on the policies and principles of the company, its line of service delivery or product offering, there are particular positions that a person with open body tattoos cannot hold in an organization. This is because such positions involve in interaction with the customers and clients and holding such a position would send a bad image of the organization to the market. Employers will be keen when hiring people for such positions. People would judge the organization principles, policies and culture from the perceived image from its employees. As a result, having a tattooed employee in the organization could send a bad image about the organization. e. garments, autos, furniture, make-up, body enrichments such as tattoos and piercing. The paper has also asserted that the tattoos are linked to behavior, and the individuals who have them on their body associated indiscipline, lack of self-control, and inability to consider the future.

Its approach was in line with similar studies like Haywood et al. (2012) who also conducted a study to investigate the relationship between tattooing and risk-taking behavior such as greater number of lifetime sexual partners, smoking, use of cannabis that was great among women and ever having cases of depression that was seen to affect men only. Such a person will not trust the psychologist and might link them to some negatively perceived behaviors like drug use, sexual behaviors and aggressiveness among others. Since the patient cannot trust the tattooed psychologist, they will not reveal all the necessary information that will necessitate their treatment. In other words, body tattoos can lead to development of a negative perception of the psychologist and hinder the development of a positive relationship between the parties during the interaction session.

The study observed that people who are in states of low-self-esteem are likely to use modifications as catharsis. Comparing with other studies, there seem to be no universal findings in which their study reported that tattooed individuals have significantly less cases of depression as opposed to their counterparts who are not tattooed. Retrieved October 10, 2016, from http://www. aauw. org/what-we-do/public-policy/aauw-issues/gender-pay-gap/ Adams, J. Cleaning up the dirty work: Professionalization and the management of stigma in the cosmetic surgery and tattoo industries. Deviant Behavior, 33(3), 149-167. Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press. Brehm, S. , Kassin, S. , & Fein, S. C. Conformity: Definitions, types, and evolutionary grounding. In V. Zeigler-Hill, L. M. doi:10. 1007/978-3-319-12697-5_15 Dean, D. H. Young adult perception of visible tattoos on a white-collar service provider.