Research on the system of smart city park based on cloud computing Critique

PAPER SUMMARY 4 2. Critique of general paper structure: Abstract 5 2. Methodology 5 2. Critique of Paper’s Abstract 6 2. Critique of Paper’s Introduction 7 2. This paper selected from IS journal. It has chosen because it includes the main purpose of study, clear paper points and structure, presents problem and solution, and supported a UML design. Why is the topic selected? This assignment presents a writing critique for a selecting of paper to improve writing skills, and quality. The definition of critique as appears in Cambridge dictionary is “a report of something such as a political situation or system, or a person’s work or ideas that examines it and provides a judgment, especially a negative one” What is the assignment about? -Where is the source of information for the journal? 1.

Background information This paper wrote by Miao Yu, Jinguo Song, and Caixia Zhang. And it has a system that uses recent technologies. Another reason is that this paper has a well structure for flow information in Information system felid. Presenting a problem and design a solution, then tested it. PAPER SUMMARY The paper purpose is improving an intelligent park in management and service level. This paper presents brief information about IoT, architecture of hardware that works with could computing, and technical scheme. Secondly, the purpose of this paper, methodology, results, conclusions, and recommendations. This paper present firstly the purpose, main concepts, and technology, methodology (Problem-solving), target, scope (cloud, sensor, software architecture and technical scheme in the park), implementation effect, and results (solving effectively solve the information island phenomenon.

recommendation and conclusions, (“provides a reference for the development of intelligent cities”). Thirdly, the abstract covered around 188 words which is around 10% of the paper. Critique of Paper’s Introduction The first paragraph, the writer created interested in the topic with general background information. There are different included that achieved as a good paper, and not as present in following: The authors provided general information about the main idea. Also, explaining the situation so the reader can make sense of the topic and the claims you make and support. But as opinion there is no clear explaining the situation. The methodology and general result explained clearly. But the specified a general type of research methodology and results is doesn’t include. Describe what is Middleware and this program features that help in the research field.

At the end of this part, the research presents that the middleware has chosen because in general it works with OS, database. Internet of things architecture, that consist of three layers, presenting each layer and where it become helpful related to research, and reflecting of the IoT intelligence for people. Component technology starts with a thesis sentences, and then presenting the development software using UML and the aim of using this language. CRITIQUE OF PAPER’S RESULTS The information herein includes the research engaged and support to the solution diagram. Writing a reflection paper Reflection What is the benefit to me from? Learning and knowledge point of view Lecturing point of view Article critique on an area not related to my research field 3.

Reviewing educational articles -What is expected if I am interested in applying what is recommend or presented? -Are there any difficulties if I wish to implement what is presented? 3. Reflection paper This section presents the reflection on internet of things. Indeed, depending on the authors’ background and previous publication that Miao Yu, Jinguo Song has different works in the same field. This paper improved my knowledge specially on connecting an IoT device with cloud in a smart city. This software is provided online for students undertaking project-based course where students work in groups. Students use SPARK to confidentially rate their own contributions to the project as well as their peers. The past study proved the advantages of SPARK such as it solves the administrative issues since it automatically collect and calculate assessments; this is significant more in large classes.

Willey and Freeman hypothesis in this extended study was to examine the effect of using SPARK with all its benefits in the engagement and developing the required teamwork skills of undergraduate engineering students. For this purpose the authors designed a methodology of a number of steps for correct and smooth implementation, including changes to the subject and changes to align assessment to the desired subject learning outcomes. Second, the questionnaire has limited number of questions where the authors could expend it to get the most of the students and lecturers experiences. Third, the analysis of the results was also limited and need more demonstrations of findings using statistical techniques. Finally, the authors stated the need of future work but they did not discuss any topic.

If a comparison would be made between this paper and one paper in the same subject e. g. The thesis statement serves as the focal point of your paper. It also provides a transition to the body of the paper and will be revisited in your conclusion. The body of your paper identifies the three (or more, depending on the length of your paper) major points that support your thesis statement. Each paragraph in the body should start with a topic sentence. The rest of each paragraph supports your topic sentence. inria. fr/hal-01116370/file/2015_CoT-SmartCity. pdf [HHU] Atif, Y. Ding, J. Jeusfeld, M.