Cost Benefit Analysis Term Paper

Loui Felony Drug Court among other such courts. Like any other institution, such drug courts and other courts attracts costs due to its many operations. This paper entails a cost benefit analysis of using Felony drug court to free up other courts of other crimes. It examines the different operations and activities by courts including rehabilitation, administration and supervision among others over a period of time and the associated costs and benefits. Cost Benefit Analysis Term Paper Introduction The felony drug courts in the city of St. The individuals must volunteer to waive their rights to a preliminary hearing and also must agree to the terms of the court. More than a third of individuals of age twelve and above have been involved in use of illicit substance at least once and over sixty million adults report the use of such.

As drug use continue to rise across the state and country, there is a subsequent increase in the number of people facing addiction. The government also in the process will continue to arrest and convict them for using drugs. There are more than 80,000 drug related offenders in incarceration across US prisons. The administrative cost per drug court case therefore amounts to about $450. The drug treatment service and total psychiatric costs during probation becomes the most reasonable index for calculating the administrative costs. Standard estimates have been developed for supervision of cases of varying intensity. The average cost of supervising case per individual is $1250 while that of supervising a probation completer while facing probation is $1050. The court activities also attract costs. The first alternative to using the felony court to free up other courts is through supervision and judicial oversight.

The judicial oversight will mainly take care of major drug related cases where the drug involved defendant will be required to appear in court for regular status hearings, attend treatment, submit random drug tests and generally meet program requirements (Ashcroft, Daniels , & Herraiz, 2004). The second alternative will be the integration of alcohol and other services involving drug treatment with justice system case processing. The main mission of this is to stop abuse of drugs and criminal related activities. The process of recovery will be promoted through a coordinated response to offenders who depend on these drugs. Alternative 1 Partial cost sharing judicial oversight and supervision by the drug court. Alternative 2 Full management of drug and other cases by the drug court. Alternative 3 Other courts being freed to be held accountable for all costs.

Alternative 4 Cost of hearings, rehabilitation and reforming process placed on families Decide Whose Benefits and Costs Count This step will mainly find out the stakeholders of the different court process. The courts inclusive of the felony drug court, are government institution that transacts their functions on behalf of the government. Benefits Costs Convenience Court Costs Case overload reduction Rehabilitation costs Lower drug use and crime Operations costs Rehabilitated individuals Administration and Monitoring Costs Cost saving Drug use testing costs The cost of using the felony drug court for cases to free up other courts of other crimes is quite lower because little resources is used. It makes it convenient for the other courts to operate and handle other criminal cases as the drug court handles drug related cases.

Furthermore, the cases are handled in way that reduces drug use and drug related crimes within the community. Courts uses a lot of resources, especially financial resources to handle cases and ensure successful hearings. It is quite important that backlog of cases are reduced by delegating roles to other courts to handle cases that are relevant to them and that is the reason why the drug court would be used to handle drug related cases and in the process reducing crime rate. 142,000 $284,000 Alternative 4 Cost of hearings, rehabilitation and reforming process placed on families 25,500 $51. 000 When all respective costs in the monetization have been considered or met then the program can be facilitated well and individuals facing charges can be helped and their situation solved.

It is important to facilitate the court programs effectively to enable free up other courts of other crimes. After this then each of the individuals can move on with their lives having reformed and served their time and completed the various programs prescribed by the drug court accordingly. The other courts can handle other cases that are not necessary drug cases and make their operations quite efficient and cost effective. The court would be requiring approximately almost $1M to handle the same cases it is currently handling. The new figure would be the net present value for the different alternatives. Perform Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the worst case scenario for comparing results. The worst case scenario in this case study would be a situation where the Felony drug court is not able to handle drug and criminal related cases and has no programs in place to help rehabilitate those affected individuals.

Consequently the court cannot be used to free up other courts of crime cases which would result in overload of cases. A comprehensive rigorous evaluation must therefore be done for the most of the programs within the drug court. This is if the sector of criminal justice is to develop a sustained investment in programs of crime prevention that and also evidence based. The evaluation should demonstrate that the court programs are effective and can provide the highest significant returns. The government should establish a precise framework that will assist in effectively estimating direct and indirect costs plus tangible and intangible costs and benefits of such drug and drug related crime prevention programs. References Ashcroft, J. pdf Loman, A. St. Louis City Adult Felony Drug Court City of St.