Critiques of Animal Testing Articles

It is impossible to replace the use of living animal in research with alternatives methods. The second reason is to advance basic biological research knowledge with the aim of understanding how living works regarding human and animals. The study of animal is a crucial part of research because many primary cells are similar in both human and animal bodies even though human organs perform extra tasks like movement, digestion, hearing, breathing, and reproduction. To treat any disease, a doctor must understand how the healthy body works which as a result assists in understanding body functionality. The purposes of the paper are to critique the analysis of the six articles highlighting the merits and demerits of using animal tests. According to four articles, the authors state that “the polio vaccine, tested on animals, reduce the global occurrence of disease from 350,000 cases in 1988 to 27 cases in 2016” (Procom, 2017).

Only animal tests close to Human in biological sense Even the body composition of animal is not wholly related to human beings, yet research uses the tests to observe how beauty products work on the human beings. There are similar inheritance limitations to the animal tests it is the currently the best method unless the alternatives tools are develops. The authors also argues on the lack of alternatives method of testing a complex living body system like human beings. The animal offers a great opportunity for biological discoveries on interrelated processes occurring immune system, central nerve system, and endocrine system. Animal allow research to Examine Entire life Expectancy Animal allow research to Examine Entire life Expectancy The researchers claimed that animal testing offer opportunity to examine the entire life cycle. The life cycle of human beings varies depending on nations.

Most of the country, the life expectancy is averagely seventy years. In some societies, the average life expectancy is eighty years while comparing with animal-like a mouse with an average life expectancy of three years. The extensive research relating the experiment allows researchers chance to undertake a thorough study and analysis on the things which affect and reduce the life expectancy. Researchers may be misled by the animal tests because some chemical proved to be dangerous, effective in animal but valuable to human. For instance, aspirin is dangerous to some species of animals while it is effective in human. The further critiques of animal research indicates that 86% researchers futile to chance the sampling and collection of the animals used in research. of research involves animals are biased and while the hypothesis, duration and number of the animal use are all flawed.

Another errors in animal’s studies includes data interpretation, inaccurate observation and the control group selective techniques of data reporting. It shows that other 20million animals that are not involved in the current research project are at higher risks of neglect or abuse in research name despite the facts that the facilities are 100% compliance with law and control by self-appointed committees. It is only direct; thorough facility inspection would unearth the main challenges facing animals in the facilities. Further research reveals that animal welfare acts do not cover, birds, rats, mice and fish which exposing such animal life to human cruelty actions and abuse. Other methods of tests that could replace animal exists. Contrary to what scientist inculcated on people mind, the research indicates that in-glass testing like examining cultures of cell in a petri dish produces accurate and useful results as opposed to the animal test.

The rabbit harmed with the eyelids held open using clips sometimes for some days. Critique of the articles Patient’s treatment forms Provided the researcher learn about the behaviour of symptoms of a particle disease in an animal, they used animal still to develop test therapies as part of the related research process. The animal data is essential to research before developing real tests data for the disease intervention before the actual therapeutic methods and procedure of surgical can administered for the patient test. The diagnostic tools and types of equipment are safe because they were developed and tested using an animal. Such means include heart transplant, heart surgery, rely on methods of animals. “Should animals be used for scientific or commercial Testing? “Understanding Issues, Understanding each other. Online] cited 2018 December 3].

Available at: https://animal-testing. procon. org/ 2. org/blog/top-five-reasons-stop-animal-testing/ 4. Wikipedia “History of animal testing” [Online] Available at https://www. peta. org/blog/top-five-reasons-stop-animal-testing/ 5 Andrea, N. and Timothy.