Essay on Gun Control

This is because the use of these guns for the wrong reasons has increased for the last decade. For instance, the Colorado shooting 2016 where around 50 people were mercilessly executed by a gunman who believed was implementing religion fulfillment. President Obama responded by claiming that the government just needs to confiscate guns under private ownership to remain only in the government agent hands. The paper will be aiming at analyzing whether there is the need to have gun control through restriction of semi-automatic weapons to reduce senseless killings. Methods of Study The study will analyze advantages of gun control and how they help in achieving low misuse of the weapons. For instance, if it is the issue of killing or robbery then it can be done even without the necessity of having those semi-automatic weapons.

Advantages of people having firearms There are various benefits associated with people being allowed to keep semi-automatic weapons such as guns in their private custody. This is because the government had multiple reasons to provide people with these guns through the registration process. Some of advantages include; Complement work on security weapons In most situations, criminals intending to inflict harm on the people tend to do it promptly thus the security personnel may fail to respond appropriately to save the damage. For instance, for someone intending to kill another, they can do it even before the security personnel returns. When fighting with firearms no side that is immunity to harm since the weapons will tend to recognize no boundary. Moreover, even the criminals will not be above other innocent people they will have to think twice when deciding on their next mission.

Therefore, people having weapons might make people live in harmony with one another. Little pressure on national resources In the situation where people got registered weapons, they can do some duties such as those expected from the security personnel. For instance, when an armed criminal attack the people they can rise to the occasion and eliminate the criminal or force him to surrender to be handed over to the justice departments. This has made them win people quickly due to the availability of these weapons while the people cannot adequately defend themselves. A good example is Colorado killings where around 50 people were killed by a single gunman on a drinking spree. The government responded by claiming that it would confiscate all those weapons owned by individuals.

The gunmen were purported to be an Islam who contended that individuals killed were gays and he was fulfilling the role given to him by his beliefs thus as a soldier of Allah gays needs to be eliminated. Regarding this confiscating, those weapons would not be the solution since in the first the person who did that thing was just a criminal. They can be able to effect much their might with the government officials thus complicating their ability to maintain law and order. Though the government has other options in situations like this to use even mightier force, then they are limits. For instance, in these circumstances where people have the same weapons as those with authorities, the only solution is resorting to either diplomacy or utilizing weapons of massive destruction.

The government has the option but no ability to do so give the collateral damage it might cause to the people. This goes all the way to the number of innocent people will suffer destruction of property and disruption of activities. This will leave behind their loved ones suffering thanks to the presence of weapons among the people. A situation like this is preventable if at all people could not be having own owned semi weapons. This is because the rate of conflict would be much lower and it would have taken the government natural moment is neutralizing the crash without many casualties. Moreover, those involved in the dispute could have found an alternative way of handling that conflict. Another thing is that although people can be allowed to own these semi-automatic weapons, then it is impossible for it to apply 100% percentage due t variety of factors.

However, if there was the total ban on those guns, it implies that even using them it will amount to facing the consequences of the wrath of the law. This will be followed by situations where people will have more expatriate of the guns thus having ways to getting away with crimes. For instance, the evidence of the firearms uses mainly revolves around the registered bullets which means that criminals can decide to look for unregistered ones to evade the law after executing their missions. Moreover, there would be increased trade on illegal weapons if people were allowed to have them at their place of residence. This would pave the way for some naughty individuals to come up with directions on how to make money from the situation.

For instance, there are some people are known to have uncontrolled tempers that they become emotional and reactive with the slightest provocation. Due to their inability to control their emotions such as tempers, frustrations and other negatives they find themselves misusing those weapons. For instance, there some cases where people have killed in love affairs after one has been frustrated by their partners. Findings Based on the discussion there is need to regulate or controlling semi-automatic weapons to fall into the wrong hands. This is based on the facts that have been laid in the disadvantages, and reasons why people misuse these guns. Gun control does not mean that one has to be denied self-protection, but the conditions for one to be issued with one should just be made more complicated.

This will enable the number of people having them to be minimal. More it makes those few with guns to be more accountable and to assure the government that those weapons are in the safe hands. Conclusion The question of whether there should be gun control through the burning of semi-automatic weapons has attracted a lot of debate. However, through comparing of things like things like advantages of allowing people to own semi-automatic weapons, disadvantages, past episodes of gun misuse and reasons why people reach that situation one can argue that there is the need for barring people against owning semi-automatic weapons. , Stoddard, S. A. , Newton, M. F. , Reischl, T. Human factors issues in firearms design and training. Ergonomics in Design, 14(1), 5-11.