Global warming is the next threat to the Human kind

It then move on to discuss the arguments that support and the objections against global warming as the next threat to humankind. The information will come from the existing research studies performed by various scientists. In precise, this paper argues that global warming will lead to diverse negative effects to human beings in the whole world. Further, if the problems of global warming are not addressed, its impacts will continue to the future decades. Global warming is commonly linked to the rise of earth’s temperatures due to the atmospheric pollution. Furthermore, the threat will be more adverse in the future years. This is due to the continued increase in human activities which would lead to higher emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. According to Dos and Leticia (2015), if the global warming would continue, the entire world would be in danger.

This is because the significant impact of global warming is the rise in the sea level due to the greenhouse effects. For this reason, the significant changes that occur before the rise of the sea level include thermal expansion as well as the melting of the polar ice sheet. Thus, the climate change will cause diverse health risks on human beings in the entire world (Duxbury 163). There are three significant categories of health risks that can face humankind if the climate change continues on its current speed. These include; direct-acting effects that are linked to heat waves, air pollution and physical weather catastrophe. Another health risk are the impacts facilitated through the changes in the ecological system related to climate change such as crop yields. The third health risk is the indirect effect relating to the displacement of people from their places or residence.

This would be a great disaster for human health regarding the spread of diseases (Ira 235). The study by NOAA since 2013 concluded that the temperatures will rise beyond 35 degrees where the human system cannot be to sustain. Thus, the heat stress will reduce labor capacity at a higher rate due to the current emissions situation. NOAA mentioned that there is evidence to prove that high temperatures can cause mortality rate among the children and fetuses. Therefore, high temperatures are still connected with health risks posed by global warming to humankind and this threat will increase in future decades. Hence, the humanity will experience threats of the spread of waterborne diseases or dehydration due to lack of fresh water. Further, the increased extreme weather would lead to flooding since the ground will be hardened reducing its ability to absorb water.

It follows that the flash floods would result to the displacement of people from the flooded areas and accelerate the spread of waterborne diseases. Consequently, the human demand for fresh water will increase due to the needs of cooling and hydration. Therefore, water would become a limited resource in the entire globe (Hughes 43). Furthermore, the law will foster the use of other forms of renewable energies rather than fossil fuel since it is a significant emitter of greenhouse gases. It is also possible to argue against this objection in that the law already exists but it has not been taken seriously. Consequently, human beings are not always good in adhering to the laws and whenever there is a law it is human nature to break it. Moreover, it has not been easy to shift to renewable sources of energies completely.

This is because the non-renewable sources are readily available in our environment. Further, there are no serious efforts which have been taken to reduce human activities. Therefore, global warming would cause diverse effects both at the present and in the future decades. This would be the case if the appropriate measures cannot be taken to reduce the emission of greenhouses gases into the atmosphere. Work Cited AAAS Board Statement on Climate Change (2006). Dos, Santos & Leticia, Britto.