Is gun control an effective way to control crime

II. The arguments of both the supporters and those who are against gun control. Why gun control cannot control crime a. Fear of the criminals on the possibility of their victim being armed. b. The popularity of guns in America can be traced from the pioneer history of the nation. For a long time guns were sold over the counter and by delivery to any adult everywhere in the country. However in the year 1968 the gun control act was formed and gun possession was limited by age, incompetence and criminal background. The rule controlled imported firearms, broadened the gun dealer licensing and record keeping and placed strict boundaries on the ownership of hand guns (Aryes et al. Even with danger posed by random gun ownership people still debate about the gun control rules and how it helps reduce crime, since the reason why the limitations were made was due to the increased crime.

Below we are going to look at the reasons why gun control is not necessary in reduction of crime then state briefly on why some people support gun control (Southwick, 270). The reasons why guns are allowed in some countries is for the purpose of self-defence. Any other use other than that is a violation of the rules. But let me pose a question to you, who can go purchase a gun legally, register it and pay for it for the purpose of committing crime? I bet your answer is no one or none at all. This explains that criminals cannot commit crime using their own registered guns, if they have any, they use illegal ones. Sometimes the criminals don’t use guns while doing their criminal activities questioning the association of crime and guns.

Instead of dealing with guns the issue that should be looked at is the lack of resources that make people commit crime (Lott et al. Some people argue that guns are a cause of many deaths but that is a baseless argument. In view of some publications of all the suicide incidences committed in a year less than one percent involve the use of a gun. This evidently shows that guns do not participate in the loss of lives. Evidently from the above reducing gun possession will have little or no desired effect of controlling crime (Lott et al. Contrary to the above, a group of people believe that if gun control is initiated the crime will reduce. They support their argument by stating that guns are the weapons by which criminals use to commit crime and if control is exercised then criminals will lack weapons and crime will lessen.

This is not a strong argument since criminals will always commit crimes as long as they have a need to satisfy whether there is a gun or not. We all know that crimes are not committed because there is the presence of a gun but because there is the presence of a need to satisfy (Duggan, 1093). Crime increase tends to have a variety of causes and looking at the causes the availability of guns is just a tiny bit of the major cause. This is evident from the many rules that have been put of gun control and still crime is being a problem that is discussed and solutions being looked into almost every time. Not trying to minimise the capability that gun control can control crime but handling of the needs that criminals have is what will curb this vice in the society.

Taking guns away or making them scarce will initiate creativity on the part of the criminal and crime will never stop. In conclusion, gun control debate is an ongoing issue whose discussions are miles far from being over. Shooting down the more guns, less crime hypothesis (no. w9336). National Bureau of Economic Research. Duggan, M. More guns, more crime.