How does the scores on five personality trait domain affect academic performance at university

This tool measures the personality of an individual and is the most commonly used model of personality in which spans across the variables of Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Openness, Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Social Desirability (Goldberg, 1992). Agreeableness Within the data generated for the portion relating to Agreeableness, it produced a mean score of 83. 92 (SD = 9. With the results at t(36) = 7. 76, p <. 62 (SD = 11. With the results at t(36) = -1. 23, p =. 23 (2-tailed), we accept the null hypothesis and make conclusion that a significant difference between the means of my peers and my score, with reference to Table 2. Considering the results, with my score just slightly higher than that of the mean of the cohort, it is not a big margin. 13, p =. 003 (2-tailed), we fail to accept the null hypothesis and make conlucion that there is a subsntail difference between the means of my peers and my scores, with reference to Table 3.

Considering the results, the mean score of my peers are lower than mine by 4. 41, which is a fairly big margin. Openness is a strong trait of an individual who enjoys venturing beyond their comfort zone (McCrae & Costa, 1987). 50, p <. 001 (2-tailed), we fail to accept the null hypothesis and make conclusion that a difference between the means of my peers and my score, with reference to Table 4. Considering the results, with my score at 111, there is a big margin between the mean of my peers and my score. Extraversion is the strongest trait of an individual who thrives being in the center of attention, and tend to be more outgoing, talkative and are leaders (Eysenck, 2009). Not only that, they like interacting with other individuals, thus, this enables them to engage in social activities (Magnus, Diener, Fujita, & Pavot, 1993).

54, p <. 001 (2-tailed), we fail to accept the null hypothesis and make conclusion that a difference between the means of my peers and my score, with reference to table 5. With the difference of 13. 89, it is a fairly big margin amd indicates that this trait is less of my characteristic. A person with high neuroticism is often disproportionate, worrying, and anxious. The issues with increased utilization of students in psychology studies in systematic researches that are examined with the widespread consensus on the five personality behaviours include openness, neuroticism, extraversion, and conscientiousness (McCrae & Costa, 2008). Conversely, researches that study the association between academic performance and personality interface are more prevalent. Meta-analyses have studied the comprehensive literature on the prognostic cogency of the five personality test for academic excellence and realized significant, positive associations between academic excellence and conscientiousness (grades and GPA) in the array of 19 to 27 (Poropat, 2009; Richardson, Abraham, & Bond, 2012; Trapmann, Hell, Hirn, & Schuler, 2007).

Moreover, an increase in the correlation between academic excellence and conscientiousness is observed after partialing out intellect (e. g. It is believed that a trait has two components which are the error and the actual ability of the person Adequate Sampling of the Trait The appropriate grouping of a character requires a clear description of the domain. The researchers in ETS have purported on enhancing a clear comprehension of different psychological behaviours, and the types of performances related to the traits. The Evidence-Cantered design (ECD) methodology to examine development facilitates adequate sampling of the behaviour by defining it. The procedure enhances understanding on the types of performances or traits that grants the evidence required to generate conclusions on the behaviours. Factor Analysis The factor analysis is designed to focus on a particular trait which may be influenced by many characteristics.